Maths-Whizz Blog

Are primary teachers THIS bad at maths?

February 15th, 2010

The Daily Telegraph takes a look at the apparently terrible maths skills of primary teachers.

A test administered by researchers for Channel 4’s Dispatches programme found that:

Only four out of 10 teachers could work out that 2.1 per cent of 400 is 8.4. Only a third knew that 1.4 divided by 0.1 is 14, and less than 50 per cent could work out that a half divided by a quarter is 2.

As The Telegraph points out, ‘The material covered in the Dispatches test is contained in the primary national curriculum…’. And this chimes, rather sadly, with our long-held assertion that most adults have a maths age of 10 or 11. This is late Key Stage 2 – primary – maths, never mind GCSE.

In itself that might be worrying, but that we only ask a C-grade maths GCSE of new Primary school teachers implies that pedagogy and method is more important than knowledge and the confidence that comes from skill.

The God of Maths is a firm believer in the idea that you don’t have to know everything to teach excellently. Just as a good manager should always hope that he promotes his subordinates’ skills above his, a teacher should hope that his charges eventually over-take him. He just has to light the fire.

Despite this, something you cannot fake or rationalise away is a basic confidence and competence in a subject, and if significant numbers of primary teachers really are failing questions like these below, we ought to worry:

  • 1.4 รท 0.1
  • 2.1% of 400
  • ABCDE is a pentagon. Name all its diagonals
  • 7/16 + 3/4
  • The mean height of a group of 4 people is 2 metres. One more person joins the group and then the mean height is 1.9 metres. What is the height of the new person?

Maths just got spooky!

October 31st, 2009

Just in time for Hallowe’en, a spooky theme has been added to the Maths-Whizz bedroom!

Students logging into our online math tutor this weekend until Tuesday will get a seasonal treat with a rolling pumpkin head, cobwebbed corners, and rolls of thunder beyond the window.

Whizzers can get a fright with some of our witch-themed measures lessons, ghoulish multiplication questions, and goblin-infested graphing problems. It’s all in Maths-Whizz, with over 1200 more animated games to teach (nearly) every maths objective under the clouded moon this weekend.

Have a happy Hallowe’en, and may your treat for 2009 be all the tasty math skills you need!

In the meantime, check out this ghostly maths lesson from a truly inspired teacher:


(via Seattle PI Big Blog)

Are teachers scared of numbers?

July 23rd, 2009

BBC News online reported yesterday that primary school teachers are:

often scared of basic numeracy and should be required to study English and maths at A-level

…according to a report by the moderate conservative Politeia think-tank.

The report, titled ‘Teachers Matter’ focuses on entry standards for teachers. An author, David Burghes, of the University of Plymouth, said:

One of the issues that bedevils our teaching profession, and particularly my subject of mathematics, is that of the inadequate subject knowledge of teachers.

But Nansi Ellis, head of education policy at the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, countered:

As well as knowing their subject, teachers need to understand the different ways children learn and develop.

Instead of hysterical reports of so-called under-educated teachers we should have a proper debate about the skills and knowledge teachers need to be good at teaching children.

The report goes on to argue that central control and management of teachers is damaging the profession, but the department for Children, Schools and Families strongly criticised the comments.

From this corner, it seems that questions about the qualifications of teachers will never go away. Commenters from both sides of the political divide will argue that life experience and teaching knowledge are more important than academic bona-fides, whilst others will argue that degree- or A-level knowledge is vital to ensure good teaching in that particular subject.

I’m inclined to hedge my bets on this one. I had excellent teachers whose passion was fuelled by their deep understanding of the subjects they taught, and I had dull teachers whose poor teaching seemed a direct result of their academic immersion.

In earlier years, I remember most the teachers who showed vigour and interest, but it was easy to spot teachers who were less confident in particular subjects. I’d like to think that the love of teaching must come first – a motivated and bright teacher can be taught fluency in a subject that isn’t her own, but a knowledgeable teacher isn’t necessarily willing to be motivated. I know that not all teachers want to tackle subjects they didn’t learn beyond GCSE – the teacher training process should identify those people and ensure they are pushed towards areas they are comfortable with.

A teacher who is dull, or even disparaging, about a subject can sometimes do more damage than good. Feel free to comment!

Moviegoing Maths Teachers

February 23rd, 2009

I’d heard there was some kind of film awards event in America over the weekend (The Olivers, The Oreos, The Otters?).

And whilst I don’t really keep up to date with hip young swingers like Sophia Loren and Ben Kingsley (concerning myself instead with matters maths tutoring), I do like to keep a toe in the cultural waters, to so speak. To this end, I’ve found a blog that combines the silver screen and the squeaky whiteboard in the shape of ‘Maths teacher goes to the movies’.

The language isn’t always suitable for the youngest Whizzers, but the blog is witty and irreverent, combining movie review and maths analysis in regular posts. Here’s the teacher’s take on some bad maths teaching in new release Doubt:

Yes folks, what we have here is a clear transgression of Maths Teacher’s (hitherto secret) First Rule of Movie Mathematics: Thou Shalt Do The Math. Clearly Sister Amy has been at the communion wine when she should have been revising her knowledge of basic fractions, and a better movie would surely have seen the eagle-eyed Ms Streep getting all righteous on Ms Adam’s ass for her shortcomings in matters arithmetic. PSH could still have been around, going on about Godel’s Incompleteness Theorems, if he was keen to be seen as “trendy” – and you just know a dedicated actor like him would go off and study the subject for a good few months, just to get the part right.

Talk about a missed opportunity!

I’ll be checking in back in with the moviegoing maths teacher soon.


Archives